Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Bug #1109309
  2. Comment #15

Comment 15 for bug 1109309

Revision history for this message
Daniel Manrique (roadmr) wrote :

Hello, so based on my previous comment I went back and retested the two first kernels, their good results stand, so we have:

6be35c700f742e911ecedd07fcc43d4439922334 - GOOD
027c0a6af42efa4f2f6034421349bd26a3ca4923 - GOOD
ea88eeac0cb8328014b53d80ca631e8dc0dc18dc - BAD :(