(In reply to comment #38)
> Thanks for the quick response! Forgive me if I've misunderstood something,
> but
> it seems that the X230 model is not included among the four in your patch.
> Does
> this mean that your patch would not fix the issue on an X230 even if you did
> include a match for the X230?
My quick response was a lucky coincidence -- I was already getting ready to post the new patch.
I did somehow end up dropping the quirk for the x230 (it was in the first two versions). Not sure how that happened. Thanks for catching it; I'll add it back.
> BTW, minor typo in your code comments - s/behavoir/behavior/ ;)
(In reply to comment #38)
> Thanks for the quick response! Forgive me if I've misunderstood something,
> but
> it seems that the X230 model is not included among the four in your patch.
> Does
> this mean that your patch would not fix the issue on an X230 even if you did
> include a match for the X230?
My quick response was a lucky coincidence -- I was already getting ready to post the new patch.
I did somehow end up dropping the quirk for the x230 (it was in the first two versions). Not sure how that happened. Thanks for catching it; I'll add it back.
> BTW, minor typo in your code comments - s/behavoir/ behavior/ ;)
Thanks!