On 11/07/2012 09:36 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:22:33 +0100,
> David Henningsson wrote:
>>
>> On some of the PantherPoint HDMI machines we currently enable, we're seeing
>> trouble with unsol events, i e detecting monitor presence, especially when
>> on battery and after suspend/resume.
>>
>> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075882
>> Tested-by: Cyrus Lien <email address hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <email address hidden>
>> ---
>> sound/pci/hda/patch_hdmi.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> So far this is the workaround we have found to be working. Sometimes, it also
>> seems that "cat /proc/asound/cardx/codec#x" can also make the HDMI unsol event
>> trigger, so that the problem fixes itself.
>>
>> We have not run any battery life tests to see if this causes more power consumption.
>
> Looks safe at least, so I applied to for-next branch to give more
> testing. If you find a better solution, let me know.
Jesse has now done a battery life test, both for idle machine and S3
machine, and both with HDMI connected and HDMI unconnected.
All differences in power consumption were within error margins. Given
that, should we consider sending this patch to stable?
On 11/07/2012 09:36 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1075882 hda/patch_ hdmi.c | 8 ++++++-- cardx/codec# x" can also make the HDMI unsol event
> At Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:22:33 +0100,
> David Henningsson wrote:
>>
>> On some of the PantherPoint HDMI machines we currently enable, we're seeing
>> trouble with unsol events, i e detecting monitor presence, especially when
>> on battery and after suspend/resume.
>>
>> BugLink: https:/
>> Tested-by: Cyrus Lien <email address hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <email address hidden>
>> ---
>> sound/pci/
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> So far this is the workaround we have found to be working. Sometimes, it also
>> seems that "cat /proc/asound/
>> trigger, so that the problem fixes itself.
>>
>> We have not run any battery life tests to see if this causes more power consumption.
>
> Looks safe at least, so I applied to for-next branch to give more
> testing. If you find a better solution, let me know.
Jesse has now done a battery life test, both for idle machine and S3
machine, and both with HDMI connected and HDMI unconnected.
All differences in power consumption were within error margins. Given
that, should we consider sending this patch to stable?
-- /launchpad. net/~diwic
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https:/