Glad you are back onto this even though it is a pain again for you. It
seems silly to me that this problem has not yet been resolved, but without
feedback of quality, as your feedback seems to be, I guess the fixers don't
have a lot to work with.
Please tell me how you are measuring the throughput? I am curious what this
newer Gusty install has left me with.
Thanx.
zeddock
On Dec 21, 2007 8:38 AM, Thom Pischke <email address hidden> wrote:
> Worth noting that I get noticeably better performance with 5.5M than
> 11M, counterintuitively.
>
> Peak actual speed at 5.5M fixed rate: ~500KB/s, Average: 200-300 KB/s
> Peak actual speed at 11M fixed rate: ~300KB/s, Average: 100-150
>
> Speeds are quite erratic, so numbers above are just to make the
> comparative advantage of 5.5M rate over 11M rate bit more quantitative.
>
> --
> Broadcom bcm43xx Wireless driver regression in gutsy
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124159
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
Glad you are back onto this even though it is a pain again for you. It
seems silly to me that this problem has not yet been resolved, but without
feedback of quality, as your feedback seems to be, I guess the fixers don't
have a lot to work with.
Please tell me how you are measuring the throughput? I am curious what this
newer Gusty install has left me with.
Thanx.
zeddock
On Dec 21, 2007 8:38 AM, Thom Pischke <email address hidden> wrote:
> Worth noting that I get noticeably better performance with 5.5M than /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 124159
> 11M, counterintuitively.
>
> Peak actual speed at 5.5M fixed rate: ~500KB/s, Average: 200-300 KB/s
> Peak actual speed at 11M fixed rate: ~300KB/s, Average: 100-150
>
> Speeds are quite erratic, so numbers above are just to make the
> comparative advantage of 5.5M rate over 11M rate bit more quantitative.
>
> --
> Broadcom bcm43xx Wireless driver regression in gutsy
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>