Comment 14 for bug 112611

Revision history for this message
Jeremy Jackson (jerj) wrote : Re: [Bug 112611] Re: ipt_connmark is broken

Speaking of advanced routers, I'm setting up Quagga on Debian, and
looking to do the same on 2 Ubuntu routers. When configuring BGP
sessions to 1 upstream provider's Blackhole route server, Linux >
2.6.20.1 is required for TCP_MD5 passwords.

What's interesting, is the debate about the kernel side, and it's
bleeding edge status... and how I find it's in Ubuntu's kernel, Feisty
and Gutsy, but *not* in Debian etch or testing.

How would a conservative Ubuntu kernel have such a bleeding edge
feature, that's pretty deep in the network stack, but not something
that's been in Debian for *years*, which is an isolated module?

Jeremy

On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:16 +0000, GSMD wrote:
> Yeah, the attitude of Ubuntu maintainers plain sucks for this matter.
> Having connmark enabled by default can't brake anything. I don't mind recompiling the kernel by hand, but this would break automatic kernel security updates and add more headache. Just don't get it.
>
--
Jeremy Jackson
Coplanar Networks
(519)489-4903