I noticed it is possible with Intel chipsets to make partitions with
different raid levels.
I will try to make raid0 and raid1 partitions for speed (OS) and
recovery (home) and see if dmraid can see them, it's a good
alternative to raid5.
Or I'll just buy one more hard disk and try to use raid10, or give up
raid and install ubuntu there as a last resort.
On 9/12/07, Thomas Bittermann <email address hidden> wrote:
> CoolkcaH schrieb:
> > Thomas are you still working on the live cd? I need it because I don't
> > have any other hard disk to install ubuntu...when you get it to work
> > please report.
> no, i don't - i waited a couple of weeks for the stuff from Heinz - but he was
> too busy i guess ...
>
> my raid5 under windows xp is really instable, so i have to do a (really slow)
> complete rebuild around twice a month. so i truly don't expect an improved
> situation if the whole thing runs under linux.
>
> as a workaround i installed ubuntu under vmware, it worked pretty well and
> performance wasn't too bad.
>
> for now i'm going back to raid1 ... sorry and good luck.
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
> --
> dmraid45 target please
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
I noticed it is possible with Intel chipsets to make partitions with
different raid levels.
I will try to make raid0 and raid1 partitions for speed (OS) and
recovery (home) and see if dmraid can see them, it's a good
alternative to raid5.
Or I'll just buy one more hard disk and try to use raid10, or give up
raid and install ubuntu there as a last resort.
On 9/12/07, Thomas Bittermann <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 97655
> CoolkcaH schrieb:
> > Thomas are you still working on the live cd? I need it because I don't
> > have any other hard disk to install ubuntu...when you get it to work
> > please report.
> no, i don't - i waited a couple of weeks for the stuff from Heinz - but he was
> too busy i guess ...
>
> my raid5 under windows xp is really instable, so i have to do a (really slow)
> complete rebuild around twice a month. so i truly don't expect an improved
> situation if the whole thing runs under linux.
>
> as a workaround i installed ubuntu under vmware, it worked pretty well and
> performance wasn't too bad.
>
> for now i'm going back to raid1 ... sorry and good luck.
>
> Cheers,
> Thomas
>
> --
> dmraid45 target please
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>