Since my last update to this bug I've started again with a fresh install of Feisty. I did a complete update before running this experiment so I ought to have the latest of everything.
Following the advice in KernelSuspendDebugging, I attempted to suspend/resume three times. Each time, I got a different message in 'dmesg'.
However, I'm not sure if this is working properly, as, even when I'm not connected to the network, when I start up again the laptop still seems to know the correct time. Shouldn't pm_trace be doing something to mess up the clock? If my clock is still correct does that mean that it's not working right?
Hi Tim,
Since my last update to this bug I've started again with a fresh install of Feisty. I did a complete update before running this experiment so I ought to have the latest of everything.
Following the advice in KernelSuspendDe bugging, I attempted to suspend/resume three times. Each time, I got a different message in 'dmesg'.
First attempt:
[ 10.487581] Magic number: 11:940:953
[ 10.487622] hash matches device ttya8
[ 10.487768] hash matches device ptyza
Second attempt:
[ 10.257222] Magic number: 11:119:46
[ 10.257233] hash matches device ttyef
Third attempt:
[ 9.658558] Magic number: 11:222:147
[ 9.658700] hash matches device ttyp1
However, I'm not sure if this is working properly, as, even when I'm not connected to the network, when I start up again the laptop still seems to know the correct time. Shouldn't pm_trace be doing something to mess up the clock? If my clock is still correct does that mean that it's not working right?