you are right ... thank you for the patience! af
Matthew Garrett wrote: > Because even if it did, the kernel isn't the only thing that may be > caching files - imagine an application with an open file, for instance. > There's no way to guarantee that things won't be damaged. >
-- ÐÏࡱá
you are right ... thank you for the patience!
af
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Because even if it did, the kernel isn't the only thing that may be
> caching files - imagine an application with an open file, for instance.
> There's no way to guarantee that things won't be damaged.
>
--
ÐÏࡱá