> Unhappily, the bad behaviour that other people are experiencing with
> the reversion wasn't intended. A wholesale re-reversion of the libata
> isn't an option because this will cause devices to change again for
>everyone, and everyone will be quite understandably upset.
Sorry, but that's precisely what we have to do, and ASAP. Please let me reiterate that the purpose of -security is *not* to fix hardware where the release did not install before. That's bad luck. Breaking hardware where it did install before is absolutely not acceptable.
Can you please prepare a feisty-security upload that reverts this change to the state of the release? Thank you!
Philip,
> Unhappily, the bad behaviour that other people are experiencing with
> the reversion wasn't intended. A wholesale re-reversion of the libata
> isn't an option because this will cause devices to change again for
>everyone, and everyone will be quite understandably upset.
Sorry, but that's precisely what we have to do, and ASAP. Please let me reiterate that the purpose of -security is *not* to fix hardware where the release did not install before. That's bad luck. Breaking hardware where it did install before is absolutely not acceptable.
Can you please prepare a feisty-security upload that reverts this change to the state of the release? Thank you!