> So you typed (/dev/hda1), instead of (hd0) in the advanced options during intall? I dont understand that point.
- I have type (hd0,0), but /dev/hda1 also should work. This will install Grub in bootsector of /dev/hda1.
But remember, in this case you must have another boot manager installed. I have Xosl. Or maybe you can make a floppy for booting Ubuntu in /dev/hda1.
> so i should install feisty on /dev/hda1 not on /dev/hda2 because that causes the problem,
> ...
> because i though that just it could be installed on MBR and not on a partition.
The system should work installed in any partition, with Grub in MBR or in bootsector. But I only could boot Ubuntu Feisty when it was installed on /dev/hda as primary partition and Grub installed entirely in bootsector of the same partition.
I don't understand why. This is not the normal behavior.
> So you typed (/dev/hda1), instead of (hd0) in the advanced options during intall? I dont understand that point.
- I have type (hd0,0), but /dev/hda1 also should work. This will install Grub in bootsector of /dev/hda1.
But remember, in this case you must have another boot manager installed. I have Xosl. Or maybe you can make a floppy for booting Ubuntu in /dev/hda1.
> so i should install feisty on /dev/hda1 not on /dev/hda2 because that causes the problem,
> ...
> because i though that just it could be installed on MBR and not on a partition.
The system should work installed in any partition, with Grub in MBR or in bootsector. But I only could boot Ubuntu Feisty when it was installed on /dev/hda as primary partition and Grub installed entirely in bootsector of the same partition.
I don't understand why. This is not the normal behavior.
Seems that have a new kernel in https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ linux-source- 2.6.20/ 2.6.20- 15.27.
Maybe, we can wait for an version 7.04-1 with this new kernel ? There are so many Ubuntu users and others trying Ubuntu who can't install Feisty.