On 3/7/07, Kevin Kubasik <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Thats right, I think this could be marked as fixed upstream, however,
> remember, the kernel isn't official yet, and even though were getting
> pretty close to a release, don't use it if unless your aware of the fun
> that comes with untested/development kernels.
>
> On a similar note, bcm43xx support is significantly better for the 4311
> series cards in Feisty, and you probably will find yourself content with
> that as opposed to ndiswrapper...
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/57355
>
2.6.20 is offical dude
On 3/7/07, Kevin Kubasik <email address hidden> wrote: development kernels. /launchpad. net/bugs/ 57355
>
> Thats right, I think this could be marked as fixed upstream, however,
> remember, the kernel isn't official yet, and even though were getting
> pretty close to a release, don't use it if unless your aware of the fun
> that comes with untested/
>
> On a similar note, bcm43xx support is significantly better for the 4311
> series cards in Feisty, and you probably will find yourself content with
> that as opposed to ndiswrapper...
>
> --
> BCM1390M (broadcom 4311) with ndiswrapper and nvidia IRQ conflicts
> https:/
>