On 10/11/06, gst <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> FYI, I reported this problem to the LKML.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/11/200 - if you have relevant informations
> please follow up on my post.
I am not sure how I can reply to a post you've created on that list (if I
didn't receive it). I just hope that they are going to read the bug report
on that web page.
If someone answers you, you might want to answer back, copying the part of
my last mail that idenfies sched_setscheduler as taking almost 8 seconds to
run in that particular short lockup.
On 10/11/06, gst <email address hidden> wrote: lkml.org/ lkml/2006/ 10/11/200 - if you have relevant informations
>
> FYI, I reported this problem to the LKML.
> http://
> please follow up on my post.
I am not sure how I can reply to a post you've created on that list (if I
didn't receive it). I just hope that they are going to read the bug report
on that web page.
If someone answers you, you might want to answer back, copying the part of
my last mail that idenfies sched_setscheduler as taking almost 8 seconds to
run in that particular short lockup.
15:44:47.164665 sched_setschedu ler(21263, SCHED_FIFO, { 99 }) = 0 <7.981930>
Cheers,
Jerome