On Jan 27 2007, Matt Grice wrote:
> On 27/01/07, Rogério Brito <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Can you even use the rt* modules successfully, even without
> > encryption?
>
> I wasn't willing to turn off the encryption on my router to test it. I
> have to be very security conscious in the area I live in :)
Can't you turn off your encryption just for a second, please, to see if
the basic functionality is OK? I would love to know if others can make
it work with the basics, before going further to test the encryption.
> I'm currently recompiling my kernel so I can use the official (and
> latest) drivers from RaLink. I couldn't get the rt61.ko module to
> modprobe - probably because of the gcc version I'm using. So I'm
> compiling them all with the same compiler - fingers crossed.
Thanks. I am curious to know if you can get things working. And, if you
get, would you please describe the exact problems that you saw and that
you didn't? I think that Ben Collins would appreciate this.
> Science is to computer science as hydrodynamics is to plumbing.
I wouldn't say this about Theoretical Computer Science, which is the,
ahem, best field of Computer Science. :-)
Hi again, Matt.
On Jan 27 2007, Matt Grice wrote:
> On 27/01/07, Rogério Brito <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Can you even use the rt* modules successfully, even without
> > encryption?
>
> I wasn't willing to turn off the encryption on my router to test it. I
> have to be very security conscious in the area I live in :)
Can't you turn off your encryption just for a second, please, to see if
the basic functionality is OK? I would love to know if others can make
it work with the basics, before going further to test the encryption.
> I'm currently recompiling my kernel so I can use the official (and
> latest) drivers from RaLink. I couldn't get the rt61.ko module to
> modprobe - probably because of the gcc version I'm using. So I'm
> compiling them all with the same compiler - fingers crossed.
Thanks. I am curious to know if you can get things working. And, if you
get, would you please describe the exact problems that you saw and that
you didn't? I think that Ben Collins would appreciate this.
> Science is to computer science as hydrodynamics is to plumbing.
I wouldn't say this about Theoretical Computer Science, which is the,
ahem, best field of Computer Science. :-)
Rogério.
-- www.ime. usp.br/ ~rbrito algorithms. berlios. de freshmeat. net/projects/ algorithms/
Rogério Brito : <email address hidden> : http://
Homepage of the algorithms package : http://
Homepage on freshmeat: http://