> Now I see that de4x5 used to be blacklisted by default by hotplug, but I
> removed last year when somebody told me that the driver was obsolete.
> Please let me know if you will finally kill it or I have to add it again
> to the default blacklist.
As of 2.4.27-2, de4x5 appears to still be the most viable driver for my
DECchip 21040 ethernet card on alpha (PCI ID 1011:0002). Let me know if you
need me to test against the current tulip module.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:33:36 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: base: de4x5.ko generates endless loop of errors with phobos p430tx
--v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
> Now I see that de4x5 used to be blacklisted by default by hotplug, but I
> removed last year when somebody told me that the driver was obsolete.
> Please let me know if you will finally kill it or I have to add it again
> to the default blacklist.
As of 2.4.27-2, de4x5 appears to still be the most viable driver for my
DECchip 21040 ethernet card on alpha (PCI ID 1011:0002). Let me know if you
need me to test against the current tulip module.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
ufymYLloRAm8uAJ 9Q0dSXRQUtGnTY5 QjbYQL1DpUnmQCg 0UAi ATZ4fLE8=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCFFbcKN6
+bLFyl4pEqEXfZ9
=yKhs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--v9Ux+ 11Zm5mwPlX6- -