Comment 26 for bug 11370

Message-Id: <1103520166.5726.1.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:22:46 -0500
From: Andres Salomon <email address hidden>
To: Horms <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#284356: SONAME bumping and d-i

--=-SCui1wdIK9i0SWMOf/sD
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:23 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 02:32:13PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:22:25 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > [...]
> > >=20
> > > A sounds fine from my point of view, as it involves the least effort.
> > > Although as I discovered this morning, there seems to be a second ABI
> > > change relating to the same patch, so we should get that out ASAP.
> > >=20
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D284356#msg68
> >=20
> > Hm, you're referring to the addition of termios_sem (which was already
> > added to 2.6), or something else?
>=20
> Yes, that is the one.
>=20

Joeyh doesn't seem to care which we do (he said it's the same amount of
effort for him both ways, he just asked that whatever we decide be
consistent for 2.4 and 2.6. So, I'm going to recommend reverting the
tty locking patch and bumping the SONAME. For 2.4, this makes sense
since the kernel w/ the broken ABI hasn't propogated to sarge yet. For
2.6, this is a bit more painful, since the broken ABI is already in
sarge, but.. *shrug*.

--=20
Andres Salomon <email address hidden>

--=-SCui1wdIK9i0SWMOf/sD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBxmGl78o9R9NraMQRAiniAKCdVXa4ilrL7oS8jB5HBb8az3CzBACgyfEo
x9mp4K7UaEyTiwtMU0qLwt8=
=O5lb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-SCui1wdIK9i0SWMOf/sD--