Comment 13 for bug 19780

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Latz (sebastian-latz) wrote :

(In reply to comment #12)
> > > For me it works, if I change the file
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a
> > > with the one of Hoary Hedgehogs version. This makes my fglrx driver run with
> > > dri! Unfortunately the contrast is very high then. I don't have a clue if its
> > > caused by the "old" libdri.a file or the fglrx xorg-module. Its the one that
> > > comes with ubuntu.
>
> Worked for me too. without strange sideeffects.
>
> So fglrx has to be updated to use new dri-api rebuild? glue? ATI itself?
> has to be done before breezy release.

No, I Think it's ATI duty to change something. The log message says it clearly:
"DRI version = 5.0.0, expected 4.1.0"

I had some similiar problems with my builtin SiS card on my laptop and Debian
Sarge (at that time SID). It always switched back to mesa software rendering
*without* some clear info messages in x-syslog. Debian provided a
backward-compatibility package with some mesa/dri things from older x-server
versions. But I think such a solution should be a definitive optional package,
because drivers shipped with x-org 6.8.2 (ati precisely) do *not* work with the
older libdri.a on my machine! If I do not uncommet the Load "dri" line in
xorg.conf, than I only can see strange deferred objects on screen ... But again,
I don't have some possibilities of comparison here so that I can't really prove
it generically.