Comment 22 for bug 420508
Revision history for this message
|
|
#22 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
(In reply to comment #37)
The original author of comment #37 subsequently made these observations in IssueTracker:
"I just executed an additional test with a much larger file, and did see that the behavior was very dependent upon how long I let the write go before trying the ls. I suspect that I had delayed long enough in my previous test to allow the system to buffer 100% of the file before I issued the ls request."
"The customer fell into the same trap that I did on their initial test (too small of a file used for the test resulted in the entire file being buffered before the ls command == no change in behavior as the new code still waits for the buffered data to be flushed). Using a larger file did indeed demonstrate a positive change in behavior."