Comment 33 for bug 14620

(In reply to comment #32)
> I have only ever received one email from Szaka, which was Message-ID:
> <email address hidden>

Right.

> It contains some quoted text which discusses this problem.

Right. I've copied all the relevant parts into Comment #8, back in April.

> It does not contain the string "hibernat" anywhere, nor does it shed any light
on the problem.

Right. All needed information is in this thread, one just needs to put
the puzzle together. It's only you who thought the private emails help.
I've nowhere said so.

> It does contain another claim from Szaka that this is a udev bug, amusingly.

There isn't any udev related comment in that email which I didn't already
copy into Comment #8. You have found again my "To me this seems to be a
kernel/udev bug" comment which is still not claim but speculation,
conjecture.

> Since he has decided that he doesn't want to discuss this anymore,

Absolutely untrue. Actually I've even explicitely asked you in comment #31
that please send the problem reports upstream, to us, developers:

Ad 1. I'll be very busy in the forecoming weeks and others may help you out
earlier (I've already refered to this in comment #29).

Ad 2. You helped me realize that privately helping here is harmful for the
users. See for example in comment #10 that I couldn't help you in the SUSE
issue and also http://blog.andrew.net.au/2005/02/25#upstream

> this bug has never been reproducible, and no other users have reported it,

Unless it was hibernation.

But whatever is the truth, Ubuntu will keep destroying hibernated Windows
(very-very rare) unless it upgrades ntfsprogs.