Comment 30 for bug 14620

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

(In reply to comment #29)
> > (In reply to comment #27)

> Don't stuck at trying to figure out what I think about udev. Forget it.
> That's not the important. The important thing is that, the problem was
> either Windows related or not. If it was then it's already solved. If it
> wasn't then it's still unknown. Going into the Windows interoperability
> direction became a waste of time for 4 months now.

Can you explain what you mean by "Going into the Windows interoperability
direction"?

> I've went over again all logs, comments and emails with Magnus and if
> you're interested then I could summarize, when I will have some spare time,
> why I think, after all, that the issue was hibernation related.

It would probably be easier for everyone involved if you would copy your
correspondence here, rather than keeping it private.

> > I don't know what you could have meant; Ubuntu hasn't used experimental versions
> > of any Linux kernel storage subsystem, ever.
>
> I was referring to the minifo overlay filesystem Ubuntu LiveCD uses.

This module was used in the very first release of Ubuntu, and only on the live
CD (which was derived from the current version of Morphix). It has never had
anything to do with the installation, and the Ubuntu live CD has not been used
with Ubuntu for over a year.

Furthermore, minifo worked at the VFS layer, and would not have had any impact
on block devices anyway.

> I didn't remember the normal distro doesn't use it. On the page
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LiveCDDesign there is a comment:
> "mini-fo is _BUGGY_."

Yes, it was buggy.

> And yes, in theory it shouldn't have matter related to this bug but the
> fields are connected enough, even if very loosely, that an unexpected
> interference, bug could cause such problem occasionally (the relocated data
> was almost 761 MB which wouldn't have fit into the memory probably).

I can't understand your sentence, but minifo is 100% provably unrelated to this
problem. There is no possible connection whatsoever, since that module was
never on an Ubuntu installation CD, and by the time this report was filed, it
was long since removed from the live CD as well.