(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > udev isn't an "underlying storage layer".
>
> Indeed and Ubuntu wasn't the first one who used it. So I don't know why you
> think I was refering to it.
Because you previously blamed udev for this problem.
> It wasn't the IDE subsystem either and if I
> remembered what it was I would name it: I don't use Ubuntu and I don't remember
> that new installation setup what I've seen 7 months ago when I checked Ubuntu
> out, in about 10 minutes. But perhaps I confuse it with another distro/livecd,
> though I doubt it.
I don't know what you could have meant; Ubuntu hasn't used experimental versions
of any Linux kernel storage subsystem, ever.
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > udev isn't an "underlying storage layer".
>
> Indeed and Ubuntu wasn't the first one who used it. So I don't know why you
> think I was refering to it.
Because you previously blamed udev for this problem.
> It wasn't the IDE subsystem either and if I
> remembered what it was I would name it: I don't use Ubuntu and I don't remember
> that new installation setup what I've seen 7 months ago when I checked Ubuntu
> out, in about 10 minutes. But perhaps I confuse it with another distro/livecd,
> though I doubt it.
I don't know what you could have meant; Ubuntu hasn't used experimental versions
of any Linux kernel storage subsystem, ever.