Comment 5 for bug 1940400

Yes, sure, but SRU procedures require defining at least some base test criteria. So I'd like us to include info about which exact Pi device is affected and needs to be tested + maybe a requirement to test it on a few other Pi's as well, just to be sure we did not regress. We need to look at the bigger picture here - and that's what the SRU procedures are for. So that we have clarity on what to test, what's the impact and how to gauge the risk. Anyway, this is basically just paperwork to fill in.

I checked the diff and compared it with the diff we had in focal - and it seems sane, there we also had so many removed lines (guess bluez etc. went away). I'm a bit worried about one more change, but I *think* I know why it was in focal. So in focal there was "+Breaks: flash-kernel (<<3.103)", and I assume it's because we had some bad changes in flash-kernel 3.98ubuntu12 (which was the previous version). Bionic was stuck on 3.98ubuntu11~18.04.2. But the question is: is that flash-kernel version good enough? What was this interaction between the two packages?

That's useful to check. I'll let it in as-is, but I'll need both the paperwork filled in and the flash-kernel breaks explained before we go out with this.