Joachim Wiedorn <email address hidden> wrote on 2010-11-17 22:31:
>
> Now I have worked the last week on an universal source package for
> Debian/Ubuntu. You can find my test packages here:
> http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/ftp/
There are new packages for Debian and Ubuntu, made with the same source
package of LILO 23.1.
While working on these new packages I have analyzed all bugreports for
LILO in Debian and Ubuntu. I have created many patches which can now be
used to close 25 Debian bugreports and 5 Ubuntu bugreports.
Finally the new packages for Ubuntu can be uploaded to the official
repository.
Would it be a good idea to make packages for Maverick, too?
Which naming scheme would be the best? 23.1-1ubuntu1~maverick1 ?
Joachim Wiedorn <email address hidden> wrote on 2010-11-17 22:31: lilo.alioth. debian. org/ftp/
>
> Now I have worked the last week on an universal source package for
> Debian/Ubuntu. You can find my test packages here:
> http://
There are new packages for Debian and Ubuntu, made with the same source
package of LILO 23.1.
It can be seen in the following git repository: git.debian. org/?p= lilo/debian. git;a=summary
http://
It can be downloaded for Ubuntu Natty (i386, amd86): lilo.alioth. debian. org/ftp/ ubuntu/
http://
and can be downloaded for Debian Squeeze (i386, amd64): lilo.alioth. debian. org/ftp/ debian/
http://
While working on these new packages I have analyzed all bugreports for
LILO in Debian and Ubuntu. I have created many patches which can now be
used to close 25 Debian bugreports and 5 Ubuntu bugreports.
Finally the new packages for Ubuntu can be uploaded to the official
repository.
Would it be a good idea to make packages for Maverick, too? maverick1 ?
Which naming scheme would be the best? 23.1-1ubuntu1~
Have a nice day,
Joachim (Germany)