tags 304260 - patch
thanks
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:20:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Hi Andrés,
>
> I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug, which will be uploaded shortly. The
> patch is attached.
>
> * debian/patches/15_space-bug.dpatch:
> diff -u lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst
> --- lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst
> +++ lilo-22.6.1/debian/lilo.postinst
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
> db_get lilo/runme || true;
> if [ "$RET" = "true" ]; then
> echo "Running lilo..."
> - /sbin/lilo || true
> + /sbin/lilo
> fi
>
> ;;
Hello Steve,
This patch is a noop, because lilo.postinst does not 'set -x', (which is
yet another policy violation), so the error status of lilo is ignored
anyway. This caused problems in upgrade-report bug #310653.
tags 304260 - patch patches/ 15_space- bug.dpatch: 6.1/debian/ lilo.postinst lilo-22. 6.1/debian/ lilo.postinst 6.1/debian/ lilo.postinst 6.1/debian/ lilo.postinst
thanks
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:20:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Hi Andrés,
>
> I've prepared a 0-day NMU for this bug, which will be uploaded shortly. The
> patch is attached.
>
> * debian/
> diff -u lilo-22.
> --- lilo-22.
> +++ lilo-22.
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
> db_get lilo/runme || true;
> if [ "$RET" = "true" ]; then
> echo "Running lilo..."
> - /sbin/lilo || true
> + /sbin/lilo
> fi
>
> ;;
Hello Steve,
This patch is a noop, because lilo.postinst does not 'set -x', (which is
yet another policy violation), so the error status of lilo is ignored
anyway. This caused problems in upgrade-report bug #310653.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <email address hidden>
Imagine a large red swirl here.