Ubuntu
lighttpd package

  1. Bug #627789
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 627789

Revision history for this message
Daniel Hahler (blueyed) wrote :

skuemmel, is the patch mentioned in comment #3 related to bug 645002 by any chance, or independent from it?

To fix this particular bug here, r2724 should get used, correct? (http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/repository/revisions/2724).