(In reply to comment #2) <snip> > There's still at least one > once-per-second timer left that also wants fixing; but the 100ms one is a good > start to get fixed soon.
So not quite fixed yet, reopening.
(In reply to comment #2)
<snip>
> There's still at least one
> once-per-second timer left that also wants fixing; but the 100ms one is a good
> start to get fixed soon.
So not quite fixed yet, reopening.