On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:03:43PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:10:08AM +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >=20
> > Running xterm against current XFree86, this problem does not appear.
>=20
> By "current XFree86", do you mean Debian's latest packages of it,
> XFree86 4.4.0, or XFree86 CVS HEAD?
I was looking at the latter. (I do have a build tree for 4.4.0, but since I
made a few fixes for Xt, was looking at the current code, partly to see if
there were other fixes I might make).
unrelated - I'm using a static copy of XFree86 for my X server on Debian (c=
an't
recall entirely at the moment, but the previous set of X packages didn't
successfully start X, but seem to recall that the current one does).
Both current XFree86 server and current Debian libraries have problems thou=
gh
(I have observed that the current Debian libraries are causing Opera to use=
a
lot of CPU, and also went back to a previous snapshot of my X servers to av=
oid
a bug - debugging the server is out of my range of interests).
I do a full build on each xterm patch check xterm and to update the XFree86
binary. When I was testing this report, it was against the build tree, sin=
ce
(if I'd seen an issue) it would be simple to recompile the related libraries
with -g so valgrind could offer more insight). Since I already have the
trees setup, it was the least work (but doesn't completely answer the
report of course).
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 06:45:39 -0400
From: Thomas Dickey <email address hidden>
To: Branden Robinson <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#250655: xterm: crashes on paste from abiword
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:03:43PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:10:08AM +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >=20
> > Running xterm against current XFree86, this problem does not appear.
>=20
> By "current XFree86", do you mean Debian's latest packages of it,
> XFree86 4.4.0, or XFree86 CVS HEAD?
I was looking at the latter. (I do have a build tree for 4.4.0, but since I
made a few fixes for Xt, was looking at the current code, partly to see if
there were other fixes I might make).
unrelated - I'm using a static copy of XFree86 for my X server on Debian (c=
an't
recall entirely at the moment, but the previous set of X packages didn't
successfully start X, but seem to recall that the current one does).
Both current XFree86 server and current Debian libraries have problems thou=
gh
(I have observed that the current Debian libraries are causing Opera to use=
a
lot of CPU, and also went back to a previous snapshot of my X servers to av=
oid
a bug - debugging the server is out of my range of interests).
I do a full build on each xterm patch check xterm and to update the XFree86
binary. When I was testing this report, it was against the build tree, sin=
ce
(if I'd seen an issue) it would be simple to recompile the related libraries
with -g so valgrind could offer more insight). Since I already have the
trees setup, it was the least work (but doesn't completely answer the
report of course).
--=20 invisible- island. net -island. net
Thomas E. Dickey
http://
ftp://invisible
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J pgp-signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- www.gnupg. org
ByHxlDocRApdqAJ 9/dHtp7MFutoCPP pc7O9YbVUJRlQCb BvjJ fPfYydE0=
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS)
Comment: For info see http://
iD8DBQFAtxhOtIq
7+KlSUvrV3UWVa8
=tFCU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VbJkn9YxBvnuC H5J--