> I must say that I do not understand what's the licensing issue here.
> openssl has a MIT/BSD-style license that is compatible to libcurl and
> WWW::Curl MIT/BSD-style licenses, isn't it? Why the need for a GPL-
> compatible license?
As noted in the mentioned Debian bug report it might be a problem for
apps/modules using WWW::Curl.
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:28:24 -0000, Patola wrote:
> I must say that I do not understand what's the licensing issue here.
> openssl has a MIT/BSD-style license that is compatible to libcurl and
> WWW::Curl MIT/BSD-style licenses, isn't it? Why the need for a GPL-
> compatible license?
As noted in the mentioned Debian bug report it might be a problem for
apps/modules using WWW::Curl.
Cheers, info.comodo. priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06 www.debian. org/ got.to/ quote/
gregor
--
.''`. http://
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://
`. `' Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://
`- NP: R.E.M.: King of Comedy