Seems reasonable, but I'm not sure if it's worth breaking the various freezes for this. However, your debdiff is not quite correct:
In debian/changelog: The release should be "gutsy", not "unstable", and it's not a "high" priority fix.
In debian/control: Since you've touched the package, you should update the maintainer field as per
<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField>.
Also, I think (but aren't sure) that your (Closes LP #foo) has the wrong syntax. I think it has to include "LP: #foo" in there, and most packages just use (LP: #foo).
Seems reasonable, but I'm not sure if it's worth breaking the various freezes for this. However, your debdiff is not quite correct: /wiki.ubuntu. com/DebianMaint ainerField>.
In debian/changelog: The release should be "gutsy", not "unstable", and it's not a "high" priority fix.
In debian/control: Since you've touched the package, you should update the maintainer field as per
<https:/
Also, I think (but aren't sure) that your (Closes LP #foo) has the wrong syntax. I think it has to include "LP: #foo" in there, and most packages just use (LP: #foo).