Comment 5 for bug 916095

Revision history for this message
Thomas Schweikle (tps) wrote :

After longer investigations, this error was a known bug related to memory management. Under certain circumstances, if memory was growing short, libvirtd tried to allocate more memory, but didn't react on errors if there wasn't enough, trying to dereference the null pointer given back in such cases. This error was fixed in one of the newer versions.