Comment 10 for bug 447442

Hi,

The bug still on lucid 10.04.1 x86 64 but it happend only with VM box.

I have try to edit avahi-daemon.conf with "randomhost" and it don't fix the problem...

With the right name of the computer , in that case was used "ubuntu", it seem working and not complaint

It the log after have reload the conf .

2010-08-25 19:12:14 moonlights avahi-daemon[17333] Got SIGTERM, quitting.
2010-08-25 19:12:14 moonlights avahi-daemon[17333] Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth1.IPv4 with address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights init avahi-daemon main process (17333) terminated with status 255
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Found user 'avahi' (UID 105) and group 'avahi' (GID 111).
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Successfully dropped root privileges.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] avahi-daemon 0.6.25 starting up.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Successfully called chroot().
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Successfully dropped remaining capabilities.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] No service file found in /etc/avahi/services.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth1.IPv4 with address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] New relevant interface eth1.IPv4 for mDNS.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Network interface enumeration completed.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Registering new address record for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on eth1.*.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Registering new address record for xxxxxxxxxxxx on eth1.IPv4.
2010-08-25 19:12:15 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Registering HINFO record with values 'X86_64'/'LINUX'.
2010-08-25 19:12:16 moonlights avahi-daemon[17434] Server startup complete. Host name is ubuntu.local. Local service cookie is xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Anyway it must be fixed to can reconize it own the domain used by the VM , because it create a few trouble with the VM about reachability. Between i have on my system eth0 and eth1 by defaut with my ethernet card

If i have new complaint , i give news

Best Regards