Comment 7 for bug 2048529
Revision history for this message
| Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) wrote Re: Do we need to keep libvirt-bin forever? | #7 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
e3ace39
(Get the code!)
Sadly the do-release-upgrade is in a screen session not directly seen in the logs.
But I'll run a "all default enter only" test whenever I come by this virtual workspace.
Until then I'm already extending that bug to do-release-upgrade for expertise on what to expect.
(Hence setting to incomplete there too)
I'm not saying do-release-upgrade does something wrong, but rather the opposite "What would be expected to be done by a package to not be removed by accident?"
Or is everything actually all right?
Furthermore, while this seems totally reproducible - this particular example is in the field since almost 4 years and comes up now. And it should affect more than just libvirt, I'd assume any transitional would be handled this way? Hence for now priority low until we know more.