Comment 13 for bug 1641618
Revision history for this message
| Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) wrote | #13 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Thank you Simon,
since this is "only" about silencing a warning it wasn't worth an SRU in my personal opinion.
I can consider to wrap it up in another SRU thou and let the SRU Team decide.
The "impact" of warnigns might be too low, but OTOH the regression potential is as well and Xenial will be with us for quite a while still :-).
I keep this task unread and would try to bundle with another SRU eventually.
But sadly ATM I can't get to bisect the other case which is required to drive it forward (FYI bug 1620407).