> I meant a Debian bug against base-passwd to begin with not a libvirt bug.
> I think the Mail you have written is a good start, yet IMHO a related bug
> can't hurt t track and make them more aware.
Ah, ok. Yes, you're right. That is BTS #843881 [1].
> Yes it is primarily @cjwatson in both cases, but he is great and
> usually pretty responsive - so no "help" needed on that.
Absolutely. I know Colin's work and interacted w/ him a few times; that "help" is not what I meant. :)
That was just in case you were also / could be involved in some part of the process before libvirt; I guess I should have asked 'Can you' instead of 'Could you'; but either way, I understand that's still vague.
So, alright; i'll keep watching the Debian bug, and ping him if that takes a bit longer.
Hi @paelzer,
> I meant a Debian bug against base-passwd to begin with not a libvirt bug.
> I think the Mail you have written is a good start, yet IMHO a related bug
> can't hurt t track and make them more aware.
Ah, ok. Yes, you're right. That is BTS #843881 [1].
> Yes it is primarily @cjwatson in both cases, but he is great and
> usually pretty responsive - so no "help" needed on that.
Absolutely. I know Colin's work and interacted w/ him a few times; that "help" is not what I meant. :)
That was just in case you were also / could be involved in some part of the process before libvirt; I guess I should have asked 'Can you' instead of 'Could you'; but either way, I understand that's still vague.
So, alright; i'll keep watching the Debian bug, and ping him if that takes a bit longer.
Thank you.
[1] https:/ /bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 843881