Comment 8 for bug 1546674

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Thanks Matt for your reply.
AFAIK that is what smb already tried in comment #4.

Never the less I checked the upgrade path once more.
With a modified conffile (just an empty line, but to not get the new one as in the bug report here)
And with an old guest created on Xenial.
It was not triggering the apparmor denies.

https://launchpadlibrarian.net/288736150/apt.xml also didn't hold a lot of differences to my guests that would help me to trigger the issue.

That said - I still look out to understand what bit of config triggers that accesses - as a valid repro is usually recommended for the SRU.
In the worst case, we have luck to have you and Simon being able to verify - but I usually at least try to be able to reproduce.