Comment 17 for bug 1916250

Revision history for this message
Robie Basak (racb) wrote :

11:45 <rbasak> vorlon: could you take a look at bug 1916250 for me please? I'm not sure it's right, but nor am I sure it's wrong.

14:29 <vorlon> rbasak: gir1.2-signon-2.0 exists in hirsute and later; gir1.2-signon-1.0 exists in focal; we support upgrades from the LTS to either the next LTS, or to the next supported non-LTS release. So there are upgrade paths to hirsute now, and to impish once hirsute EOLs, so yes it's correct to SRU this fix

17:00 <rbasak> vorlon: I agree it needs SRUing. My question is if a sole unversioned Replaces is correct.

17:00 <vorlon> rbasak: ah, that should be fine