I'm surprised to see Replaces without a Breaks, and further for the Replaces to be unversioned. This doesn't match one of the cases listed at https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition, and https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#id11 explains why usually a Breaks is also required.
Since I'm not sure this is correct, I'm reluctant to accept it on review. I'm not sure it's necessarily wrong, either. I'll ping Steve for an opinion.
I'm surprised to see Replaces without a Breaks, and further for the Replaces to be unversioned. This doesn't match one of the cases listed at https:/ /wiki.debian. org/PackageTran sition, and https:/ /www.debian. org/doc/ debian- policy/ ch-relationship s.html# id11 explains why usually a Breaks is also required.
Since I'm not sure this is correct, I'm reluctant to accept it on review. I'm not sure it's necessarily wrong, either. I'll ping Steve for an opinion.