Comment 56 for bug 979320
Revision history for this message
|
|
#56 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
First off - please move this discussion to <email address hidden>.
To your question:
(In reply to comment #39)
> This IS a nasty bug in the specification that from my point of view needs to be
> fixed.
>
No it's not. Did you read the spec? It is referring to svg in that particular section. Svg is not going to change, and I would strongly oppose deviating in subtle parts from that standard, to accomodate an implementation bug in _one_ ODF consumer. Please note further that with 3.5.3, we *do* correctly read old documents, and note even further that there's about a million other things that won't show up correctly in OOo 1.0, if you make it load a current ODF1.2-extended document. Get real.