Comment 34 for bug 1846940
Revision history for this message
|
|
#34 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Simple Questions / Feedback / Observations (please don't take offence):
* You have a stable version (6.2), so what is the purpose of something like the 6.3 version, with multiple releases. I can understand alpha/beta versions being available whilst bugs/design issues are being addressed, but when you remove those statuses and give it what appears to be a "released" version nomenclature, then user expectation changes accordingly.
* This problem, which at first sight seems to be quite serious for those afflicted by it, has been identified around 10 months ago. Given the previous point, not having any feedback regarding ETA (or even if it is being looked at) is disturbing. As I said, purely from a user's perspective, ver 6.3 looks like a production version of LO. And therefore, I would also have an expectation about having to revert as a result of inactivity, losing as a result, the slew of excellent enhancements present in 6.3
regards, Steve