Comment 6 for bug 1822839
Revision history for this message
|
|
#6 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
This knowledge about java.vendor strings encoded in a javavendors.xml is unfortunately at the heart of how module jvmfwk works internally. I'm looking into changing that at least for current master (towards LO 6.3), so that jvmfwk assumes that a JRE with a java.vendor not listed in javavendors.xml can be used by LO.