Comment 6 for bug 299353

Hi,

If the package doesn't exist then you can't depend on it. You need to work
out whether you should instead depend on something else, or back-out the
change.

In this case it is depending on a -common package to get the icons. The
-common package was removed with the icons going back in to the other
lib package. It seems wrong to have one SONAME of a lib depend on a later
one, so I think this package should just be changed to carry the icons again.

You would need to check if this changes co-installability of the lib packages
though.

Thanks,

James