I think there's actually some other issue with it - it's supposed to
recognize them more generally, or some such. There's something on that
somewhere in this humongous bugreport, or in a bugreport linked to from
this one.
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 23:31 +0000, baaz wrote:
> So all this just because libgphoto2 in the latest release of Ubuntu is
> outdated? ;)
I think there's actually some other issue with it - it's supposed to
recognize them more generally, or some such. There's something on that
somewhere in this humongous bugreport, or in a bugreport linked to from
this one.
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 23:31 +0000, baaz wrote:
> So all this just because libgphoto2 in the latest release of Ubuntu is
> outdated? ;)