On 23/09/08 at 05:02 -0000, Joseph Method wrote:
> I'd like to file a bug against the communication in this report. Also,
> there is a caesura at the end leading to a breakup that is hard to
> follow.
>
> Actually, here's an explanation to save others time:
> 1. Neil Wilson uploads a package
> 2. Lucas Nussbaum and Scott Kitterman and others disagree with details about the packaging
No, I also disagree with the solution that was chosen to fix the bug
(the use of alternatives).
> 0. Clarify that "don't use gems" isn't a solution. Gems are used for different reasons than Deb packages.
No, what should be clarified is how much support we want to provide to
users of rubygems on Ubuntu.
> 3. Commit that *if* Debian rejects movement toward a solution, Ubuntu _can_ maintain its own solution.
AFAIK, the Debian rubygems maintainers has never been consulted on this
topic.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| <email address hidden> http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: <email address hidden> GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
On 23/09/08 at 05:02 -0000, Joseph Method wrote:
> I'd like to file a bug against the communication in this report. Also,
> there is a caesura at the end leading to a breakup that is hard to
> follow.
>
> Actually, here's an explanation to save others time:
> 1. Neil Wilson uploads a package
> 2. Lucas Nussbaum and Scott Kitterman and others disagree with details about the packaging
No, I also disagree with the solution that was chosen to fix the bug
(the use of alternatives).
> 0. Clarify that "don't use gems" isn't a solution. Gems are used for different reasons than Deb packages.
No, what should be clarified is how much support we want to provide to
users of rubygems on Ubuntu.
> 3. Commit that *if* Debian rejects movement toward a solution, Ubuntu _can_ maintain its own solution.
AFAIK, the Debian rubygems maintainers has never been consulted on this www.lucas- nussbaum. net/ |
topic.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| <email address hidden> http://
| jabber: <email address hidden> GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |