Comment 44 for bug 190744
Revision history for this message
| Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto) wrote Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81 | #44 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
Which, in practice for Chris, means there is no need to have a dummy package nor a replaces/conflicts dependency, only the package name change will do, glom will have to be built/depends against the new library and then we can ask archive to remove the old libgdamm, right? Thanks for the explanation Stefan.