Comment 7 for bug 2046154

I don't anticipate a problem with this, at least in principle, from an SRU team perspective. However I can't give a pre-ack because it would depend on a review of the specifics that we don't have right now.

New features are permitted to be added in LTSes. Further, Ed25519 support for DKIM in spamassassin seems like something that would fall under our "changes in the environment, server protocols, web services, and similar" policy category and therefore would be allowed in principle at any time, even if not planned in advance (which is even better!).

I will double-check with the SRU team that the team's view as a whole matches mine.