There's now an additional failure on armhf only, which is most probably related to the armhf test runners being executed as LXD containers on a base system using an older kernel:
That "upstream-root" test is a new case, which is not yet available in the -release version of libcap2 (1:2.44-1build3), therefore this should not be considered a regression, but rather an issue with the test infrastructure. IMO this test case should be skipped or hinted on armhf.
There's now an additional failure on armhf only, which is most probably related to the armhf test runners being executed as LXD containers on a base system using an older kernel:
autopkgtest [09:46:55]: test upstream-root: [------ ------- ------- --- ------- ------- --]
@@@ Running upstream tests (root required) @@@
## Preparation ##
## libcap2 tests ##
user namespace launched exploit worked - upgrade kernel
autopkgtest [09:46:58]: test upstream-root: -------
autopkgtest [09:47:02]: test upstream-root: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - -
upstream-root FAIL non-zero exit status 1
That "upstream-root" test is a new case, which is not yet available in the -release version of libcap2 (1:2.44-1build3), therefore this should not be considered a regression, but rather an issue with the test infrastructure. IMO this test case should be skipped or hinted on armhf.