Comment 22 for bug 209181

well, I'm asking because I have the impression, that gnucash is way more popular than qbankmanager, right?

So not having libaqbanking in a state so that gnucash can be built against it would be suboptimal imho, but even this would need a downgrade of packages. OTOH, if I understand Debian #303234 correctly, Gwenhywfar would eventually solve the no hbci issue.

(Why do these source packages have names that are so awkward to type btw. *g*).

Anyway, release-wise, I assume that the best option is to go for the upgrade. ACK #2, confirming.