Hello and thanks for working at this merge. By looking at the history of the package what I see is that:
1. At some point Ubuntu delta was introduced to replace a reference to /etc/libnss-ldap.conf with /etc/ldap.conf. The reason for this is unclear to me (no bug references in d/changelog). Example diff:
2. In the Debian revision 2.0.1-2 that reference to /etc/libnss-ldap.conf was dropped, likely as part of the changes which pertain to this d/changelog entry:
* Depend on nslcd instead of libnss-ldap, and us it's config.
(Closes: #610971, #681266.)
Still the Ubuntu delta was partially retained, see:
Hello and thanks for working at this merge. By looking at the history of the package what I see is that:
1. At some point Ubuntu delta was introduced to replace a reference to /etc/libnss- ldap.conf with /etc/ldap.conf. The reason for this is unclear to me (no bug references in d/changelog). Example diff:
https:/ /git.launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ ldapscripts/ commit/ ?id=ab326cc6a8e 9edfb8dba5c7ea5 e219ade59be612
2. In the Debian revision 2.0.1-2 that reference to /etc/libnss- ldap.conf was dropped, likely as part of the changes which pertain to this d/changelog entry:
* Depend on nslcd instead of libnss-ldap, and us it's config.
(Closes: #610971, #681266.)
Still the Ubuntu delta was partially retained, see:
https:/ /git.launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ ldapscripts/ commit/ ?id=5a2fbdb26d8 49043c81a06afdd d5ec858788aeb6
My impression is that this is not correct.
So I have two questions now:
1. Do we still need an Ubuntu delta here, given that 2.0.1-2 dropped the dependency on libnss-ldap? If we don't, let's just sync the package.
2. If it turns out that we still need a delta, do we agree that the current one is wrong and needs to be adapted?
Thanks!