That was my understanding of the block - to keep what has been released but prevent new releases in Debian from arriving in Ubuntu until someone offers to maintain a LAVA instance in/for Ubuntu. Why was 2016.8-1 allowed to bypass the block?
There should be no releases of lava-server in Ubuntu after 2014.9.post1 but I'll leave it up to Ubuntu developers to decide whether to apply this to wily as that's been released. yakity should not have lava-server nor should any further uploads to Debian migrate into Ubuntu until further notice.
That was my understanding of the block - to keep what has been released but prevent new releases in Debian from arriving in Ubuntu until someone offers to maintain a LAVA instance in/for Ubuntu. Why was 2016.8-1 allowed to bypass the block?
There should be no releases of lava-server in Ubuntu after 2014.9.post1 but I'll leave it up to Ubuntu developers to decide whether to apply this to wily as that's been released. yakity should not have lava-server nor should any further uploads to Debian migrate into Ubuntu until further notice.