/etc/power/ appears to be a configuration directory for the pbbuttonsd daemon, which is powerpc-specific; these scripts are certainly unrelated to pm-utils integration, and I have no intention of touching this given that I'm not in a position to test changes regarding pbbuttonsd integration.
> May the script /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/laptop-mode better be named with a number too? Like 96laptop-mode,
> to make sure it is called after 95hdparm-apm.
Letters already sort after numbers.
As for whether laptop-mode-tools should be enabled by default, there is already a separate bug open for this issue, so that's not a reason to keep this bug report open (and is scope creep wrt the original request in any case).
/etc/power/ appears to be a configuration directory for the pbbuttonsd daemon, which is powerpc-specific; these scripts are certainly unrelated to pm-utils integration, and I have no intention of touching this given that I'm not in a position to test changes regarding pbbuttonsd integration.
> May the script /usr/lib/ pm-utils/ power.d/ laptop- mode better be named with a number too? Like 96laptop-mode,
> to make sure it is called after 95hdparm-apm.
Letters already sort after numbers.
As for whether laptop-mode-tools should be enabled by default, there is already a separate bug open for this issue, so that's not a reason to keep this bug report open (and is scope creep wrt the original request in any case).
> According to /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ pm-utils/ +bug/239419/ comments/ 5
> https:/
> the kernel's laptop_mode has been hardcoded to be enabled on battery all the time anyway.
I'm not sure what the basis for this claim was, but it's definitely wrong.
$ cat /proc/sys/ vm/laptop_ mode
0
$