As commented on bug 700213, I cannot reproduce it.
I'm not sure how you can detect the main dialect (afaik, there is no place where it says that es_ES or de_DE is the main one), so I'd say we should show all translations present, even if they don't have a language code.
In this particular case, we'd show:
es
es_MX
es_PR
Since otherwise, in the current form, users are being forced to use "es_MX" or "es_PR", as "es" alone is not shown.
Hi Gunnar,
As commented on bug 700213, I cannot reproduce it.
I'm not sure how you can detect the main dialect (afaik, there is no place where it says that es_ES or de_DE is the main one), so I'd say we should show all translations present, even if they don't have a language code.
In this particular case, we'd show:
es
es_MX
es_PR
Since otherwise, in the current form, users are being forced to use "es_MX" or "es_PR", as "es" alone is not shown.
Thanks for your work on this.